? ?
WORLD / Middle East
White House pushes back on Iraq report
(AP)
Updated: 2007-08-31 12:02
WASHINGTON - An independent assessment concluding that Iraq has made
little political progress in recent months despite an influx of US troops
drew fierce objections from the White House on Thursday and provided
fresh ammunition for Democrats who want to bring troops home.
A resident stands near a burnt vehicle as it is towed away from the site
of a car bomb attack in Baghdad, August 29, 2007.?[AP]
The political wrangling came days before the report was to be officially
released and while most lawmakers were still out of town for the August
recess, reflecting the high stakes involved for both sides in the Iraq
war debate. President Bush, who planned to meet Friday at the Pentagon
with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is nearing a decision on a way forward in
Iraq while Congress planned another round of votes this fall to end the
war.
A draft report by the Government Accountability Office concluded Iraq has
satisfied three of 18 benchmarks set by Congress and partially met two
others, a senior administration official said Thursday. None of those are
the high-profile political issues such as passage of a national oil
revenue sharing law that the Bush administration has said are critical to
Iraq's future.
The State Department, Pentagon and White House dispute some GAO findings,
including the conclusion that Iraq has only partially met tests involving
its budget process and legislation dealing with semiautonomous regions in
the large, multiethnic country, two officials said.
Administration officials also disputed that Iraq has failed to provide
three trained and ready Iraqi brigades to support Baghdad operations or
to ensure that the security plan will not provide a safe haven for
outlaws.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal
deliberations that included lengthy meetings Thursday at the White House.
The GAO may alter some of its findings in response to administration
arguments, one official said.
Administration officials also said the draft report is unrealistically
harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to each benchmark.
The GAO found that Iraq had fully met requirements to:
- Establish political, media, economic, and services committees in
support of the Baghdad security plan. That plan involves many of the
30,000 US troops Bush sent to Iraq this year.
-?Establish joint security stations in neighborhoods across Baghdad.
-?Ensure the rights of minority political parties in the Iraqi
legislature are protected.
Bush has suggested he intends to stick to his Iraq strategy, but in his
meeting Friday at the Pentagon he's expected to hear some of the Joint
Chiefs express deep concern at the long-term impact on the military of
maintaining a heavy troop presence in Iraq in 2008 and beyond. Now, there
are more than 160,000 troops in Iraq, the most since the war began in
2003.
The Army and the Marine Corps have shouldered most of the burden,
creating strains that service leaders fear could hurt their recruiting as
well as their preparedness for other military emergencies. The Joint
Chiefs are not, however, expected to urge Bush to withdraw from Iraq
entirely as many Democrats want.
"It is clear that every objective expert keeps providing the American
public with the same facts: that the president's flawed Iraq strategy is
failing to deliver what it needs to?- a political solution for Iraq,"
said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
GAO officials briefed congressional staff behind closed doors, promising
an unvarnished assessment when an unclassified version of the report is
publicly released on Sept. 4.
"The real question that people have is: What's going on in Iraq? Are we
making progress? Militarily, is the surge having an impact?" said White
House spokesman Tony Snow. "The answer is yes. There's no question about
it."
But Democrats and even some Republicans say military progress made in
recent weeks is not the issue. If Baghdad politicians refuse to reach a
lasting political settlement that can influence the sectarian-fueled
violence, the increase in troops is useless, they said.
The Pentagon and State Department provided detailed and lengthy
objections to the findings by the congressional auditors.
Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said Thursday that after reviewing
a draft of the GAO report, policy officials "made some factual
corrections" and "offered some suggestions on a few of the actual grades"
assigned by the GAO.
"We have provided the GAO with information which we believe will lead
them to conclude that a few of the benchmark grades should be upgraded
from 'not met' to 'met,'" Morrell said.
State Department deputy spokesman Tom Casey said the GAO should at least
note progress made when ruling that Iraq has failed to meet a specific
benchmark.
Democrats are expected to try to use money needed to support the war as
leverage to bring troops home. The Pentagon has requested $147 billion
for Iraq and Afghanistan for the 2007 budget year, which begins October
1. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday suggested Bush should not be
asking Congress to approve "tens of billions more dollars" when
independent voices like GAO find the Iraqis are failing to reach a
political accord.
"With the president continuing to stay the course in Iraq, Republicans
will have to decide whether they will continue to vote with him or join
Democrats and the vast majority of Americans who are demanding a new
direction in Iraq and refocusing America's efforts on fighting the real
threats of terrorism around the world," said Pelosi, D-Calif.
The GAO report is one of several assessments called for in May
legislation that funded the war: Retired Gen. James Jones briefs Congress
next week on his assessment of the Iraqi security forces; Gen. David
Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, and Ryan Crocker, the US ambassador
to Iraq, testify the week of Sept. 10. Bush will deliver his own progress
report by Sept. 15.
Bush is meeting Friday with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Defense
Secretary Robert Gates in a secure conference room at the Pentagon known
as "the Tank."
Maj. Gen. Richard Sherlock, director of operational planning for the
Joint Chiefs, told reporters this would be the Joint Chiefs' opportunity
to "provide the president with their unvarnished recommendations and
their assessments of current operations."
It did not appear that the session was intended to work out a consensus
military view on how long Bush should maintain the US troop buildup in
Iraq or how soon to transition to Iraqi control of security.
Bush will be hearing from Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs;
Adm. William Fallon, the senior commander of US forces in the Middle
East; and top commanders in Baghdad.
Top World News ?
* 10th anniversary of Princess Diana's death marked
* Korean hostages tell of hidden diaries and fear
* Film on abuses by US troops in Iraq stuns Venice
* 8 died in Brazil train collision
* Final South Korean hostages freed
Today's Top News ?
* China introduces toy and food recall system
* China growth offers 'good opportunity'
* Japan urged to be prudent on Taiwan
* Liu Xiang wins 1st world athletics crown
* China appoints new ministers
Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
Learn Chinese, Learn Mandarin online, Learning Materials, Mandarin audio lessons, Chinese writing lessons, Chinese vocabulary lists, About chinese characters, News in Chinese, Go to China, Travel to China, Study in China, Teach in China, Dictionaries, Learn Chinese Painting, Your name in Chinese, Chinese calligraphy, Chinese songs, Chinese proverbs, Chinese poetry, Chinese tattoo, Beijing 2008 Olympics, Mandarin Phrasebook, Chinese editor, Pinyin editor, China Travel, Travel to Beijing, Travel to Tibet
No comments:
Post a Comment