Opinion / Raymond Zhou
What's wrong with an office dress code?
By Raymond Zhou (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-06-03 05:46
The Transport Bureau of eastern China's Zhejiang Province recently
announced a set of codes for office-hour conduct:
One should not wear slippers to work; one should not take young children
to play in the office building; male employees should not wear sleeveless
T-shirts or grow a beard or moustache; females should not wear clothes
that are too revealing, etc.
Public opinion is divided. Those for it argue that a government office
should look "prim and proper," and detractors contend that even civil
servants need "a smattering of color" or "some individuality."
"We don't want to go back to the 1960s and 70s and drown ourselves in a
sea of blue and gray, do we?" they ask.
It's safe to bet that nobody would want to embrace the dress code of that
era. But I'm on the side of the Bureau for regulating in-office conduct,
including dress codes.
The crux here is the dividing line between how one comports oneself
during vs. after office hours.
As a general rule, employers have the right to dictate things like that
as long as they are reasonable and make sense. For example, salesmen in
office towers are usually made to wear suits, which would help them exude
an air of professionalism; but it would be ludicrous to ask construction
workers to do the same.
As long as the rules are applied to everyone in the same line of work on
an equal basis, I don't see a reason to cry wolf. If you find the rules
too harsh, you can raise the issue with your boss, and when worse comes
to worst, you can always quit your job and find an office environment
that suits you.
Granted, I admit that the global trend is towards relaxing erstwhile
rigid codes, especially for workers who do not need to interact with
clients. When I was working at a Silicon Valley media company, my boss
used to say: "If you don't dress as if you're on your way to the beach,
it'll be okay with me."
Of course, that leaves plenty of room for manoeuvering, as does "not too
revealing." But on the whole, the Zhejiang decrees make perfect sense and
by no means drive employees back to the puritanical age of 40 years ago.
The other rules are even more sensible. During the "good" old days, some
offices in China had a theme part atmosphere. People bantered and
frolicked, except they didn't treat customers with courtesy.
For those who protest the protocols on the grounds of personal freedom,
I'd say: You're right. Office workers such as government employees do not
have freedom in this area. They are not supposed to. It is not the place
to flaunt your sartorial creativity.
The freedom we need to protect is what one wears in one's own time. Even
in the late 70s when opening up was on the horizon, scissor hands were
dispatched on the street in some cities to cut the leg cuff of flare
trousers.
No matter how outrageously one is dressed, the public should not impose
their judgment in place of moral standards. And exceptions apply only to
public spaces where things like indecent exposure are involved. But it
has become more complicated when performances of an artistic nature are
involved.
The most ridiculous thing I've heard recently is an expert proposing a
dress code for people in their own homes. The gist is, one should not go
naked while at home.
This is laughable. Unless it's a lewd act of exhibitionism, which is
quite rare, what one wears at home, or whether one wears, is purely a
matter of personal freedom. He can't expect us to wear a suit while using
the shower, can he?
Of course, this is not what the expert meant. He could be talking about
moments of privacy or intimacy that might be spotted from nearby windows.
And he could be worrying about Sharon Stone-type femme fatales corrupting
kids of James Stewart-like innocence and curiosity. But his time would be
better spent worrying about things other than those happening behind
closed - or even open - windows of other people.
The Zhejiang formalities and decorums are mostly common sense. The
environment in question is a government office, not an artist's studio.
That should render groundless much of the controversy.
There was a time when discretion alone would be enough in matters of this
kind, but in the age of increased personal rights, it's wise for the
bureau authorities to clarify the no-no's.
Most jobs have restrictions. If you want to be truly imaginative, create
your own space or become an artist.
E-mail: raymondzhou@chinadaily.com.cn
(China Daily 06/03/2006 page4)
Hot Talks
� Share Our Crafts: Naming contest
� The microprints of 1980s Shanghai
� The ceremony at the White House
� Do teenagers really need mobiles?
� China's Serious Environment Problem
Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
Alibaba is the largest B2B marketplace in the world. Source model ship,
wooden puzzle, one-piece toilet, RC hovercraft, photo album, prom dress,
pocket bike, Vaginal Speculum, Samurai Sword, String Panty and PVC Pipe.
Learn Chinese, Learn Mandarin online, Learning Materials, Mandarin audio lessons, Chinese writing lessons, Chinese vocabulary lists, About chinese characters, News in Chinese, Go to China, Travel to China, Study in China, Teach in China, Dictionaries, Learn Chinese Painting, Your name in Chinese, Chinese calligraphy, Chinese songs, Chinese proverbs, Chinese poetry, Chinese tattoo, Beijing 2008 Olympics, Mandarin Phrasebook, Chinese editor, Pinyin editor, China Travel, Travel to Beijing, Travel to Tibet
No comments:
Post a Comment